What to read next?

For anyone who is a reader, the question of what to read arises from time to time. Book lists abound at the end of the year. There are challenges galore all over the book-blogging world. There are books like this or this.

On April Fool’s Day, I somehow followed a link to this blog post. It along with a few others gave a very clever response to some recent (at that time) essays that addressed the what to read question. Joel Stein in the New York Times skewered adults who read young adult books and Maura Kelly wrote a Slow Book Manifesto in the Atlantic.

The most recent New Yorker contains an ad to a new book blog, Page Turner. In general, I’m pro-book blogs and pro-New Yorker. But the ad read: “Introducing our new literary blog, with criticism, contention, and conversation about the most important books for the moment.” (emphasis mine) And the tagline is “Books that Matter.” I don’t know, something about that just make me want to go out and read a pulpy romance just to be rebellious. Interestingly, in the same issue Arthur Krystal has an essay about the pleasures of genre fiction that comes down more on the side of guilty pleasures not being so guilty.

On the other hand, I do think there is merit to reading outside of your comfort level, to challenging yourself. So where is the answer to what to read?

I’m not sure if he’d like to be used as an answer to that question but Alan Jacobs’ answer in The Pleasures of Reading in an Age of Distraction works for me.

So this is what I say to my petitioners: for heaven’s sake, don’t turn reading into the intellectual equivalent of eating organic greens, or (shifting the metaphor slightly) some fearfully disciplined appointment with an elliptical trainer of the mind in which you count words or pages the way some people fix their attention on the “calories burned” readout- some assiduous and taxing exercise that allows you to look back on your conquest of Middlemarch with grim satisfaction. How depressing. This kind of thing is not reading at all, but what C.S. Lewis once called “social and ethical hygeine.  p. 17

Some readers may be puzzled to find that this book didn’t end several pages ago. Read at whim, I told you- What more is there to say?
Perhaps there’s a little more that could be said. “Whim” may not cover all the bases. But before I go any further I want to insist that it remains the foundation. It should be normal for us to read what we want to read, to read what we truly enjoy reading. p. 33

My only discontent with this book was that I didn’t read it before reading Moby Dick, which for me was absolutely the equivalent of swallowing down a vitamin that I somehow thought was good for me but tasted horrible. It also made clear to me why something holds me back from signing up for book challenges and the like. Or why the stack of books on my shelf given to me by people that told me I “should read such and such” is vaguely stressful to me. I’m a person who likes lists but I also get a little anxious if things don’t get checked off and finished. More and more, I’m looking to read by what strikes my fancy. To follow rabbit trails. To be more spontaneous. To allow for serendipity. To read for pure pleasure (with no guilt). To read according to my whim.

11 thoughts on “What to read next?

  1. I have a confession: I am addicted to book challenges. ;-). Actually, I can only go from my list for so long until I HAVE to break out and read something purely for pleasure.

  2. Love this post! I’ve read that Joel Stein article, and I find his opinion baffling and depressing. I don’t understand why certain individuals feel the need to be the book police, feeling justified in deriding others for their reading choices; or claim one genre to be superior to another genre. I read what I want, and I have no problems quitting a book that’s not appealing to me. And that’s not to say I never read outside my comfort zone; I just don’t keep reading if I don’t like it. I love that Alan Jacobs quote. It perfectly captures my views on the subject.
    That’s why I don’t join reading challenges. I don’t want to be pigeon-holed into a commitment that will make me miserable in carrying it out.

  3. Amy and Tooka-
    I didn’t mean to imply that book challenges are bad. I always like the IDEA of them but my personality is such that I end up turning it into an assignment and feeling all guilty if I’m not doing my work. Then I end up grumpy because I’m reading something I “have to” instead of something I “want to” when the idea of a challenge is never to make you not read what you want.

    I often get ideas from what to read from challenges in the book blogging world. So I’m glad they are out there for less uptight people than me to enjoy.

  4. I feel like I spent so many years ingesting “required reading” that I’m challenge-phobic now. That’s not to say that I don’t read out of my comfort zone; I have “should reads” as well as “want to reads.” But I like being the one making the lists, and underlying it all is “whim” — or as I tend to think of it, “readiness” — another formulation of the same principle.

    (I seem to be enjoying “quotation marks” today…)

  5. Pingback: The Summer of Shelf Discovery | Supratentorial

  6. Pingback: The Narnian: A Few Thoughts | Supratentorial

  7. Pingback: Best of 2012 in Books | Supratentorial

  8. Pingback: September Reading | Supratentorial

  9. Pingback: Ten Years in the Tub | Supratentorial

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s